Polished work no longer proves thinking.

Nyvaros Learning redesigns assessment with your faculty, one programme at a time, in six to eight weeks.

You receive redesigned assignments and programme level evidence of where assessment is exposed to AI.

We do not detect AI use or monitor students.

Start a scoping conversation

Start a scoping conversation

Why now

Assessment is under scrutiny worldwide.

Universities and regulators around the world are asking the same question: does a grade still show that a student understood? In a 2025 UNESCO survey of 400 respondents from UNESCO higher education networks in 90 countries, 19% reported a formal AI policy at their institution and 42% said one was still being developed.

A 2026 systematic review of 67 studies of university students found that the effect of ChatGPT on thinking depended on how the task was designed around it. Structured tasks were linked to gains, and unstructured use to cognitive offloading (Li, Cui and Hagedorn, 2026).

The Pilot

Six to eight weeks. One programme.

The Visible Cognition Pilot works with one programme, course cluster or faculty cohort. It is not a detector, not surveillance and not proctoring.

The problem

A finished assignment no longer shows that a student understood it. Detection is unstable, and bans push AI use out of sight. Assessment has to change, and faculty need a redesign they can run themselves.

What we do

We work with faculty to redesign how a programme is assessed, so that student thinking becomes visible without detection or surveillance. In a randomised trial with nearly 1,000 secondary school students in Turkey, those who practised with unguarded AI scored 17% lower on an exam once it was removed (PNAS, 2025).

What you receive

Faculty workshops, redesigned assignments, a programme level view of where learning rests only on AI vulnerable tasks, and a final report with a recommendation on whether to scale. Scope and fee are agreed at a first conversation.

The problem

A finished assignment no longer shows that a student understood it. Detection is unstable, and bans push AI use out of sight. Assessment has to change, and faculty need a redesign they can run themselves.

What we do

We work with faculty to redesign how a programme is assessed, so that student thinking becomes visible without detection or surveillance. In a randomised trial with nearly 1,000 secondary school students in Turkey, those who practised with unguarded AI scored 17% lower on an exam once it was removed (PNAS, 2025).

What you receive

Faculty workshops, redesigned assignments, a programme level view of where learning rests only on AI vulnerable tasks, and a final report with a recommendation on whether to scale. Scope and fee are agreed at a first conversation.

The problem

A finished assignment no longer shows that a student understood it. Detection is unstable, and bans push AI use out of sight. Assessment has to change, and faculty need a redesign they can run themselves.

What we do

We work with faculty to redesign how a programme is assessed, so that student thinking becomes visible without detection or surveillance. In a randomised trial with nearly 1,000 secondary school students in Turkey, those who practised with unguarded AI scored 17% lower on an exam once it was removed (PNAS, 2025).

What you receive

Faculty workshops, redesigned assignments, a programme level view of where learning rests only on AI vulnerable tasks, and a final report with a recommendation on whether to scale. Scope and fee are agreed at a first conversation.

Who it is for

For the people who own assessment.

Nyvaros Learning works with the teams responsible for how a university, college or school system teaches and assesses in the age of AI, in any country.

Teaching and learning centres

Teams that guide faculty on assessment and need redesigns that faculty will actually use.

Quality and integrity offices

Offices that must show responsible assessment practice, and want evidence that goes beyond a policy document.

Faculty innovation units

Writing centres and innovation units piloting change with one programme, one course cluster or one faculty cohort.

Teaching and learning centres

Teams that guide faculty on assessment and need redesigns that faculty will actually use.

Quality and integrity offices

Offices that must show responsible assessment practice, and want evidence that goes beyond a policy document.

Faculty innovation units

Writing centres and innovation units piloting change with one programme, one course cluster or one faculty cohort.

Teaching and learning centres

Teams that guide faculty on assessment and need redesigns that faculty will actually use.

Quality and integrity offices

Offices that must show responsible assessment practice, and want evidence that goes beyond a policy document.

Faculty innovation units

Writing centres and innovation units piloting change with one programme, one course cluster or one faculty cohort.

Start a conversation

If your institution is rethinking assessment in the age of AI, write to contact@nyvaros.com.

Start a scoping conversation

Start a scoping conversation

Start a conversation

If your institution is rethinking assessment in the age of AI, write to contact@nyvaros.com.

Start a scoping conversation

Start a scoping conversation

Start a conversation

If your institution is rethinking assessment in the age of AI, write to contact@nyvaros.com.

Start a scoping conversation

Start a scoping conversation